"A duty, an opportunity and a pleasure": connecting archives and public history by Haunton, Melinda and Salzedo, GeorgieThis article explores the intersection of public history and archives, with particular reference to the practice of promoting broad participation in interpreting the historical past. Key concepts in public history such as democratising history, power dynamics, authenticity and the role of audiences in history-making are examined in dialogue with analogous archival concepts and activities. The extent to which UK archives are sites of public history is tested, providing evidence of the breadth of activity falling within a definition of public history and thereby demonstrating the value of engagement between these parallel disciplines. The article closes with suggestions for developing an ethics of public history within archives, informed by the theory and practice of both disciplines but with an essential focus on the specificity of the public history context of archives. The authors do not attempt to resolve areas of tension between the disciplines, but argue for a constructive relationship which recognises what public history has to teach archives and what in turn archives can bring to debates on sharing the past with wider audiences. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Publication Date: Spring 2021. Archives & Records. v.42, no. 1. p.40-57.
History Can Be Open Source: Democratic Dreams and the Rise of Digital History by Locke, Joseph L., and Wright, BenIn an ongoing commitment to experimentation, the AHR invited an "open peer review" of a submitted manuscript, "History Can Be Open Source: Democratic Dreams and the Rise of Digital History," by Joseph L. Locke (University of Houston–Victoria) and Ben Wright (University of Texas at Dallas). Given that Locke and Wright argued for the coexistence of transparency alongside formal academic peer review, subjecting their submission to an open review made sense. The peer review process itself tested the propositions about the democratization of scholarship they put forth in their submission. Their article appears in a new section of the AHR , "Writing History in a Digital Age," overseen by consulting editor Lara Putnam (https://ahropenreview.com/). The maturation of digital history has propelled historians' embrace of open educational resources. But, this article argues, open access licensing is not enough. Digital history's earliest practitioners promised not just more accessible digital materials, but a broader democratization of history itself. This article therefore moves beyond questions of technological innovation and digital access in the rise of digital history to engage more fundamental and intractable questions about inequality, community, and participatory historical inquiry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Publication Date: December 2021. American Historical Review. v.126, no.4. p.1485-1511.
Metahistory as Public History: On Introducing Metahistorical Perspectives in Events about Events by Ola InnsetThis article argues that the introduction of 'metahistorical perspectives' can greatly enrich the practice of public history. Through the example of a series of public events about important historical events held at the National Library of Norway, it is argued that an attention to microhistory, pedagogical theory and especially William Sewell Jr.'s theory of events can be beneficial when programming events for the general public. This focus on 'metahistorical perspectives' in the practice of public history stands in contrast to widely held notions of public history as entailing simplifications and 'dumbing down' of academic knowledge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Publication Date: March 2022. History. v.107, no.375. p.392-407.